ISO/IEC 17025:2017 – First impressions from Eurachem

« Back to Previous Page
137
0

Eurachem share a first impression of the new ISO 17025. New structure, more risk-based thinking, a process orientation, and a...

Please to read the entire article.

Marked as spam
Posted by Stephen Ellison (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 14, 2017 12:00 am
30 views
0
Private comment
Thanks for the contribution Stephen.
Marked as spam
Posted by Paula Adams (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on December 15, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Stephen's analysis hits the spot; nonetheless, the actual words of the changes need to be carefully reviewed and addressed as needed.
Marked as spam
Posted by Peter Unger (Discussions: 0, Comments: 4)
Replied on December 15, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Peter: Certainly true. Accreditation bodies will be looking carefully at the wording and will interpret with practical implementation in mind. And I'm sure ILAC and EA will be working to harmonise interpretation across their members. A first impression isn't the last word!
Marked as spam
Posted by Stephen Ellison (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 16, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Good document, thanks for the information
Marked as spam
Posted by Xavier LOMENECH (Discussions: 0, Comments: 5)
Replied on December 16, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Very interesting document-thanks to Stephen and Kyriacos!
Marked as spam
Posted by Isabelle Vercruysse (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 16, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Good overview Stephen, hanks for the information.
Marked as spam
Posted by Jacqueline Scott-Brown (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on December 16, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thank you, it is great review!! All of a sudden changing from the current one to the new one looks less intimidating than anticipated!
Marked as spam
Posted by Sara Prins (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 17, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Much appreciated synopsis.
Marked as spam
Posted by Michael Brodsky (Discussions: 0, Comments: 3)
Replied on December 17, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
thank you
Marked as spam
Posted by Carolina Mendoza Forero (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 17, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thank you Stephen!
Marked as spam
Posted by Eugenio Corral (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 17, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Excellent review, I appreciate the insight.
Marked as spam
Posted by Michael Mark Brady, P.G. (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on December 17, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Very good overview Mr. Stephen, thanks for the valuable information.
Marked as spam
Posted by Gamal Mohamed (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 18, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Mr Stephen, think most of the ISO systems have become more risk orientated.
Marked as spam
Posted by Wong Siew Ha (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 18, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks for the overview , very informative.
Marked as spam
Posted by farai mujuru (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 18, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks a Lot!
Marked as spam
Posted by Denise Angeletti (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 20, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks
Marked as spam
Posted by Daniel Torres (Discussions: 0, Comments: 12)
Replied on December 21, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
I think I SO/IEC 17025 : 2017 is clear and has more detailed . Thank you
Marked as spam
Posted by Pataraporn Tanapavarit (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 21, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Hi, the new version seems better but why it was decided not to appoint a Technical Manager and a Quality System Responsible ? Best regards and Merry Christmas for everyone !
Marked as spam
Posted by Leonardo Cizmic (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 21, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks very much Stephen - this is a very informative look at the new version, which also gives an interesting insight into ISO's evolving view of quality and compliance.
Marked as spam
Posted by Andrew O'Hara (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 26, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks for the detailed review.
Marked as spam
Posted by Barbara Guidi (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 26, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Very good overview; totally agree
Marked as spam
Posted by Dr. Medhat EL-Bayoumi (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 29, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Awesome article! Finally something useful at LinkedIn !
Marked as spam
Posted by Luciana Harris (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 30, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Leonardo The name hasdisappeared as for the System Manager
But nothing has changed just you may call him as you wish

5.5 b) specify the responsibility, authority and interrelationship of all personnel who manage, perform or verify work affecting the results of laboratory activities;
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on January 1, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Good review for those of us needing to make a start on the new version, at least the technical is mostly still applicable as is.
Marked as spam
Posted by Jeanri Coetzee (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on January 1, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
A very good synopsis - thank you Steve!
Marked as spam
Posted by Felix Dlamini (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on January 15, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thank you for sharing
Marked as spam
Posted by Syed Basheer Uddin (ADQM) (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on January 15, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thank you for sharing :)
Marked as spam
Posted by Julie Coaker (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on January 16, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
A good synopsis which very much matches my recent UKAS training on the new Standard.
Marked as spam
Posted by Tony Gillam (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on January 16, 2018 7:00 pm
« Back to Previous Page