Please help me to know the basic difference between ISO 17025 :2005 and ISO17025:2017

« Back to Previous Page
1
0

Please to read the entire article.

Marked as spam
Posted by SHAFIQUL Islam( NEWTON) (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 24, 2017 12:00 am
1212 views
0
Private comment
Check a CIM/ICM contribution about that! http://www.cim2017.com/
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on December 23, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Ok sir .Means need to buy first ....
Marked as spam
Posted by SHAFIQUL Islam( NEWTON) (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 24, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Marked as spam
Posted by Massimiliano Sinico (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 25, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Marked as spam
Posted by Dimitris Theodorou (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 25, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Contribution of CIM 2017 should give you all information that you need.
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on December 26, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Also take a look at the official ISO summary document at https://www.iso.org/publication/PUB100424.html .
Marked as spam
Posted by Stephen Ellison (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on December 27, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
No I mean that is possible to read without payment
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on December 28, 2017 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks all for your cooperation .It's great help for me .
Marked as spam
Posted by SHAFIQUL Islam( NEWTON) (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on January 1, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
I have not read the latest version of ISO 17025:2017 However among and during the discussions i came to understand that in the latest version the management requirements are aligned with quality management requirements of iso 9001 2016 where in much emphasis is given on risk assrssment rather than root cause analysis and preventive measures. technical requirements being almost the same
however one has to read thoroughly the new standard along with the iso 9001.
Marked as spam
Posted by Khalid Mohiuddin (Discussions: 0, Comments: 6)
Replied on January 9, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
There are no big changes
You can continue using your current quality manual or you can identify your activities and responsibilities
The term of quality manager and technical manager no more existing i.e you identify the activities and who responsible to perform them(but you can leave it as quality manager and Technical manager)
Quality policy sholud be modified to include impartiality
Imapartiality should be identified and it is impacts and how to avoid them
Risk managements should be identified
Marked as spam
Posted by Mahmoud gendi (Discussions: 0, Comments: 4)
Replied on January 11, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Mahmoud voila une tres bonne synthésse. Very nice synthesis.
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on January 11, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Is there any strategy for risk Assessments as for ISO/IEC 17025.
Marked as spam
Posted by Dr. Prashant Umare (Discussions: 1, Comments: 3)
Replied on January 13, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Risk assessment are cloe to the current 4.9 and preventive action. Risk on the testing process
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on January 15, 2018 7:00 pm
0
Private comment
Marked as spam
Posted by Patrick Reposeur (Discussions: 1, Comments: 15)
Replied on January 15, 2018 7:00 pm
« Back to Previous Page