Risk Management_Post 4( ISO17025/2017)

« Back to Previous Page
2
0

Step1: risk diagnosis or identification: there are several reasons that may arise a risk e.g.: environmental conditions, poor calibration, equipment,...

Please to read the entire article.

Marked as spam
Posted by Hossam Farouk Ali (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 27, 2018 12:00 am
66 views
0
Private comment
Great information Mr.Hossam
Marked as spam
Posted by Mohamed Adel (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 26, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks
Marked as spam
Posted by Hossam Farouk Ali (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 26, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Nice information
Marked as spam
Posted by Mohamed Salama Elimam (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on March 26, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks Mohammed
Marked as spam
Posted by Hossam Farouk Ali (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 26, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Point nicely explained
Marked as spam
Posted by AJAY KUMAR SHARMA (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 27, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Thanks
Marked as spam
Posted by Hossam Farouk Ali (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 28, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Do you realize that all of what you mentioned is basically in the mandatory procedures for ISO 17025:2005? We have been addressing risk all along!
Marked as spam
Posted by Gray Warner (Discussions: 0, Comments: 9)
Replied on March 29, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
My aim of these post is clearly demonstrated in an introductory post. However, I am very flexible and open minded to hear from you or others .By mutual and valuable discussions and opinions I will enhance my knowledge, and decrease my weaknesses. I would be really happy to get valuable information.
Marked as spam
Posted by Hossam Farouk Ali (Discussions: 1, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 29, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Each Claus of iso 17025/ 2017 have risk and you shauld adress risks and opportunities 8.5.
You can count risks in each of QP of your system and action you can do ,
Following by time table to monitoring these risks to be insured that risks do not affect on your technical or managerial quality
That the new issue of ISO/17025/2017
Marked as spam
Posted by Dr/ Mohamed Shaltout (Discussions: 1, Comments: 2)
Replied on March 29, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
At least this means that no real changes are necessary, providing your QMS is already robust
Marked as spam
Posted by Lee Willison BSc, PCQI (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on March 29, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Good explaination . Thanks !
Marked as spam
Posted by Gnoungo Mariam KONE (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on March 29, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Very good analysis.
Marked as spam
Posted by Ambrogio Colombo (Discussions: 0, Comments: 2)
Replied on March 30, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Love that piece of information, worth to read
Marked as spam
Posted by STEPHEN OMWAMBA (Discussions: 0, Comments: 3)
Replied on March 30, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
As mentioned that each QP is addressing risk I would like to add that it will be good that for each SOP whether validated or not to contain at table for risk assessment for the particular SOP identifying, evaluating and suggesting the remedial action to ben taken and such table can be standardized and fixed at the end of each SOP.
Marked as spam
Posted by Kamal Ismail (Discussions: 0, Comments: 1)
Replied on March 30, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Yes that s right . That s more easier than prepare separate sop or qp contains all risks assessment and remedial actions
Marked as spam
Posted by Dr/ Mohamed Shaltout (Discussions: 1, Comments: 2)
Replied on March 31, 2018 8:00 pm
0
Private comment
Great work, thank you
Marked as spam
Posted by Anass EL KADIRI (Discussions: 1, Comments: 6)
Replied on April 1, 2018 8:00 pm
« Back to Previous Page