Page contents not supported in other languages.
Featured articleThe Random Years is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2022Good article nomineeListed
September 8, 2022Peer reviewNot reviewed
October 4, 2022Peer reviewReviewed
October 23, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 24, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that The Random Years includes a version of strip poker played to Antiques Roadshow?
Current status: Featured article

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Aoba47 (talk). Self-nominated at 08:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • suggesting some hooks of my own :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT4: ... that the first and only season of The Random Years was the lowest-rated original program on network television that season?
    • ALT5: ... that The Random Years was panned as suffering from "a serious case of sitcomitis"?
      • Thank you for the edits to the article. Apologies for those very silly mistakes. Those two hooks look good. Thank you for the suggestions as those are always appreciated. As I said in my note, I am not the best at all about finding a good hook. Aoba47 (talk) 02:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Article recently taken to GA by the nominator. All the hooks (including the additions by theleekycauldron) are cited properly and interesting enough. No sign of copyvio. QPQ done. This should be good to go IMO. FrB.TG (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing this. I would more than happy with any of the proposed hooks being used. I do not have a strong preference either way. Aoba47 (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]