Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- 2a00:23c5:50e8:ee01:79fb:bc74:bedf:ff0c (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. . DatBot (talk) 10:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- W1Wkk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). . DatBot (talk) 18:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sehwaan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). . DatBot (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 42.3.147.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). . DatBot (talk) 01:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 1011bogh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Equine-man (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) This user is vandalizing the Fallout (TV series) page by putting out "That's some 🐂💩 if I've ever heard it. Fan reception has actually been divisive from what I am aware. Someone prove me wrong please." for the citation. They did it at least 3 times and I reverted their edits. Please block them for disruptive editing for at least a month or two. Mxhyn16 (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. and Mxhyn16 has violated 3RR. -- ferret (talk) 23:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 136.50.124.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) season 1: Persistent disruptive editing. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)- See 103.243.44.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) now. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Conservan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Zunbils (diff): vandalism after final warning. WP:ERA troublemaker. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:197:901:3AF0:71CD:3BCC:7896:5A3F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Marcus Aurelius (diff): Vandal only. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- That1guyfrfr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On David Spivak (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User's edits consist of repeated vandalism to the same article over weeks. Their recent user talk page post indicates that they are WP:NOTHERE and only interested in vandalism. — MarkH21talk 05:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- 173.207.12.88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On User:CanonNi: vandalism after final warning.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 05:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Lickmypedia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "LickFoo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Kedvine promotionz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used z instead of s attempting to skip filter: Promotional? 2. Violating string: kedvine promotions" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reginamalayaleeassociation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Михаил Гаврилюк (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hoborecordz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used z instead of s attempting to skip filter: Promotional? 2. Violating string: hoborecords" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Sonnuu499 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. User has made promotional edits to WP:AFC/R.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 09:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. (stage names are generally treated the same as real names) The issue here is their edits, not the username. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 16:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Melinda Looi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Well-known person? See the article Melinda Looi. Geoff | Who, me? 12:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well it doesn't look like impersonation, and real names are allowed.
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Secretlondon (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Glane23, I think I read WP:REALNAME the same way you do, but it does seem like there's no impersonation here. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well it doesn't look like impersonation, and real names are allowed.
- Create account Tools Username (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- IXL Driving School (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 03:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Yun Jin
Reason: Four different IP addresses (at the time of writing) inserted spam into the article, with edit summaries and inserted contents starting with "ROCK ROCK N ROLL" or "BOBBIT TIRES!!!", and continued doing so despite their edits being reverted. 0xC0000005 (talk) 05:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nearly made my own request. Chipping in on this to say that this vandalism consistently happens with Genshin Impact character articles in particular, and it never stops even after protection ends. If possible, a month or more of protection should be applied like at Raiden Shogun and Furina (Genshin Impact), which was because of this type of vandalism. λ NegativeMP1 05:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Fjorm
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring LTA target; see page history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Valkyrie Profile 2: Silmeria
- Valkyrie Profile 2: Silmeria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Pending changes isn't going to cut it for this troll. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Radiant Historia
- Radiant Historia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent LTA target. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Atelier Ryza 2: Lost Legends & the Secret Fairy
- Atelier Ryza 2: Lost Legends & the Secret Fairy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. ♠JCW555 (talk)♠ 05:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Atelier Ryza 3: Alchemist of the End & the Secret Key
- Atelier Ryza 3: Alchemist of the End & the Secret Key (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism ♠JCW555 (talk)♠ 05:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Atelier Shallie: Alchemists of the Dusk Sea
- Atelier Shallie: Alchemists of the Dusk Sea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism ♠JCW555 (talk)♠ 05:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Atelier Escha & Logy: Alchemists of the Dusk Sky
- Atelier Escha & Logy: Alchemists of the Dusk Sky (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism ♠JCW555 (talk)♠ 05:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Free Church of England
- Free Church of England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary as the problems that caused vandalism have now passed. I think that Semi protected status would now be most suitable. Arrowe6365 (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Draft:Anton Mazurov
- Draft:Anton Mazurov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Change "Draft:Anton Mazurov" to "Anton Mazurov" ZIKZU (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Submit it for review by putting {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done. @ZUKZU: Draft:Anton Mazurov is not protected, therefore this edit request is not actionable. Please read the message from Jéské Couriano above.- @Jéské Couriano: There wasn't a submit button on that draft; I just added one. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I just deleted it as an obvious copyright infringement, https://antidote-sales.biz/anton-mazurov Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
| 3 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled( • view requests)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser( • view requests)
User:REDACTED403
I would like access to make typo error fixing edits to the wiki, as existing tools I have perms for don't let me filter for those. -REDACTED403 (talk) 05:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) User:Can't stop the stopr
I would like to improve my workflow with copywriting on Wikipedia, as finding typos can be tedious and AWB can help with this. Can't stop the stopr (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:AbsoluteWissen
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed( • view requests)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed( • view requests)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover( • view requests)
User:Mcljlm
Reason for requesting file mover rights I'm an autoconfirmed user. There are times when a file title needs changing but currently I'm unable to do that. Mcljlm (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer( • view requests)
User:Pbritti
Requesting a trial period of a month or less (dealer's choice) to address the backlog. I was previously granted this permission last summer but resigned them after a request to do so stemming from my repeated draftification of articles on potentially notable subjects that were created by disruptive editors (a more detailed accounting of that can be found in the discussion that took place on my talk page). Essentially, I wouldn't do that again, instead following the current NPP best-practices of leaning on more procedural alternatives like PROD, AfD, and improvement tags. I have a good amount of experience in AfC, have participated in a decent number of AfDs, and have a strong track record with my own article creations. I can provide additional context or affirmations of understanding of the current NPP standards as requested. I would prefer a trial period of at least two week so that my use of the permission can be observed and critiqued with enough examples. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC) User:Jtrrs0
I've got some experience at AfD, both participating and nominating. I have also written one article which was approved at AfC and got C-rated. I also have relevant experience in anti-vandalism, which shows I always try to be friendly to newcomers and I am always open to being corrected. I'd obviously be happy to have it granted on a trial basis. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Aplucas0703
I have made many constructive edits to Wikipedia, and have a decent amount of experience in Articles for Creation, and I have approved AfC reviewer for nearly 1 year. I have had no controversy thus far while working in this area. I mainly want to focus on patrolling the backlog of redirects, but occasionally I would also review articles. I also know my limits, and only work in the areas I am confident in, or I seek help. I am big on assuming the good faith of editors and pointing them in the right direction if their efforts are misguided, as I often do at AfC. aaronneallucas (talk) 04:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) User:Dan Leonard
I'm nearing the end of my trial period just as the May backlog begins and I'd like to keep my permissions to participate. I've been intermittently active with new page patrol and I think my page curation log should show fairly uncontroversial activity and AfDs with consensus for my proposals. Reviewing the log myself there are two articles I marked as reviewed but were later deleted, but both appear to have been deleted for G5 (created by banned user) and not for notability or other content reasons. Dan • ✉ 06:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Klbrain
I'm coming to the end of a two-month trial, and write to request that this access be extended. I've worked on NPP and, as asked, AfD. Many of these AfDs have been my proposals, which has been a helpful learning experience! Klbrain (talk) 09:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Storye book
On 13 December 2023 I was granted a 3-month new page reviewer rights trial, which expired on 12 March 2024. I reviewed 5 new articles in 2023, and 8 new articles in 2024. My habit is to spend a lot of time on each article, helping to expand them sometimes, and helping to bring some of them to DYK - which is why I did not attempt to achieve high numbers of new page article reviews. Being overloaded with WP research (some for my local Civic Society, which wanted WP articles on several historical subjects - all for free of course) I have had to miss out on new page reviews for a while. I was also needed to help with the recent DYK review backlog. But I would like to get back to it. So if you think that I have been useful so far, please would you kindly extend or confirm my new page reviewer rights? I have added my name to the May 2024 new page review list, but would like confirmation that I am still a valid member of this working group. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Storye book (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Grahaml35
Hello! In December of 2023 I applied for New Page Reviewer Rights and given a 1 month trial period then again in January of 2024 I was granted 3 months. I am here today to apply for permanent rights. Over the last 90 days I have reviewed 370 articles. A short background on myself I've been on Wikipedia for over eight years and have created 47 active article on EN Wikipedia. I have strong knowledge of the policies that a NPP reviewer must follow and how each article should be treated. I would like to to continue to help decease the large article backlog currently on Wikipedia. I would be happy to answer any questions. Thank you! Grahaml35 (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Knowledgegatherer23
I would like to participate in the upcoming backlog drive. I have done a trial period before. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 17:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) User:Orange sticker
Hi, I'd like to help with the backlog, I enjoy doing maintenance tasks like WP:CAT and WP:ORPHAN and I've submitted AfDs for articles I've come across in this process: as well as taking part in more contentious deletions. Obviously still learning but have experience of quite a few different outcomes now such as redirect, merge and transwiki options. Orange sticker (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC) User:SafariScribe
Hi, I'm volunteering to help in patrolling new pages on Wikipedia. Over the months I have stayed here, I've learnt much on relating with editors including the early mistakes I did at first; those have improved my person. It's also pleasing participating in the May drive. Thanks for considering me.— Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) User:NYMan6
Hi, I would like to start start volunteering to help patrol pages across the Wikipedia site. I've been on the site for quite some time, sometimes I may make some mistakes around but it has led me to create more pages and overall be a more active person. I find it pleasing to help Wikipedia more and make it a more pleasing, friendly and diligent environment of people. Thank you for looking through, and hope whoever sees this has a blessed day. NYMan6 (talk) 20:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC) User:GSS
I was added to this group on a 2-month trial period and was instructed by Hey man im josh to re-apply a week before the permission expires. Therefore, I'm requesting to continue using this tool so I can review newly created articles. Thank you. GSS 💬 05:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover( • view requests)
User:Xkalponik
I'm an Articles for Creation reviewer and I need this right to make things easier. One of my recent submission reviews needed a move without redirect, but I couldn't as I didn't have that right yet. There have been many such incidents and will be in the future. I wish to be granted this right and I believe I meet the requirements now (was declined previously). Thank you. X (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) X (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives
I am requesting this right for the following reasons:
I have participated in various requested moves and I have performed some myself in order to acquire to naming conventions (both within pages in the main space and from my sandboxes to the main space), and I have also started a few move discussions too. I know about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including naming conventions, and I often take part in AFD and other discussions, and I also have created articles and categories. I am happy to answer any questions or do a trial run. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer( • view requests)
User:Nihonjoe
There are a number of articles on my watchlist that require pending changes to be reviewed. This would facilitate reviewing those changes and approving or declining them as appropriate. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Grabup
With two years of dedicated service and prior receipt of reviewer rights twice, I respectfully requesting this right again. My intent is to assist in reviewing pending changes and lightening the workload for fellow editors. I remain committed to upholding Wikipedia's standards of accuracy and reliability. Granting me this privilege again would enable me to contribute more effectively to the platform's mission of disseminating knowledge to the world. Grabup (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:NebY
I can't say I'd use this often and am not intending to patrol, but a number of the pages on my watchlist have pending-changes protection (even by my request) and I do sometimes see good edits to them awaiting acceptance. I am accustomed to filtering out vandalism, test edits, unsupported edits and the like, and to following WP:BLP (though a lot of my watchlist's deep in ancient history and mythology). NebY (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback( • view requests)
User:TheTechie
I am TheTechie. I was suggested by User:Synorem to become a rollbacker as I, at least in their words, am encouraged to apply for rollback. I meet the requirements as follows:
Requesting permission because of these reasons. Thanks --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Vestrian24Bio
Reason for requesting rollback rights: Hi! I am Vestrian24Bio; I have been editing on Wikipedia for almost 2 years now, I have made 2000+ edits and I have already reverted 200+ vandalisms, mostly using Twinkle. See my contributions here. Now, having the Rollback permission would be more helpful in patrolling vandalisms and it would grant me access to using the AntiVandal thus, making it easier to fight vandalisms. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 04:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Myrealnamm
Reason for requesting rollback rights. I have at least 200 mainspace edits, frequently warn users, and no edit warnings. However, I do not yet have a month of experience patrolling Recent Changes. I would like to request rollback rights because it would be easier for me to revert vandalism through View History. I have a habit of going back to View History after comparing edits, and having the Rollback user right would make it easier for me to revert edits on View History pages. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:MuffinHunter0
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor( • view requests)
User:Nihonjoe
I regularly edit templates while working on various articles on my watchlist, or when creating new articles that are part of something covered by a template. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]Usage
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
