Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, Write English in Cyrillic, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mean as custard (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Mean as custard (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unapproved article move

Hello it would have been most appropriate if you had consulted the community via its talk page before your move of the Nexus 7 article. There was a clear reason as to why the article's name was "Nexus 7" -- the tablet was designed jointly by Google and Asus. I request an immediate revert of your move. Since you seem to be new to WP, I will forgive and forget your actions. If you do not comply, I will request the move from an admin, and your actions will be constantly monitored for future unapproved article moves. Thank you --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 11:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There won't be a next time, because you already know what's expected of you prior to an article move. I did not tell anybody to move it back because the purpose of my post above was to get you to move it back. Anyway, I find your request on my talk page very ironic. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 11:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you refer to the Wikipedia policy to back up any of your claims or uncivil actions, Speedy Phil? --JBrown23 (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of writing systems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Morse code

Please do not mess with numerical data in articles (or for that matter, anything factual), as you did here, unless you really do know what you are talking about or else you have reliable sources to confirm you are right. SpinningSpark 12:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have not finished...

When you moved this question from the Science Ref Desk to the Humanities Ref Desk, you seem to have missed a couple of important steps.

At a minimum, you should leave the original section header in place on the Science desk with a direct link to the new location, so that the original poster – and anyone else who participated in, or was interested by – the original discussion can follow where the question went. (See Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines#When moving a posting.)

As a courtesy, particularly with new or first-time posters, it's also nice to notify the original poster on his or her talk page that you've moved their question, along with a brief and polite explanation of your reasoning. Please, can you take care of all of that, and bear it in mind if you move any posts in the future?

As an aside, I'm not sure that your move was to the best location. Yes, the question is arguably a 'Humanities' topic because it involves criminology, but its close link to medicine means that it's actually likely to encounter people who know the answer in its original location on the Science desk. Given the overlap with multiple topics and spheres of expertise, if I were to move such a question anywhere, I would probably have gone with RD/Misc. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since it looks like you're not around anymore, I've undone the move as the simplest thing. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am here. Czech is Cyrillized (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Python 3.3.2 reference document.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Python 3.3.2 reference document.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Why's (Poignant) guide to Ruby.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Why's (Poignant) guide to Ruby.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Czech is Cyrillized. You have new messages at Miss Bono's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Miss Bono [zootalk] 12:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Python 3.3.2 reference document.pdf listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Python 3.3.2 reference document.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:IPA Number chart (C)2005.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Open Condom Style listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Open Condom Style. Since you had some involvement with the Open Condom Style redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Czech is Cyrillized. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]