Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

Hello, Duonaut! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Duonaut! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why the fuck would you call my article a stub when it has three paragraphs? You're acting like it has only one sentence when it doesn't. Mediterraneanism check (talk) 16:29, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just because I marked it as a stub doesn't mean it's bad, and stubs aren't always one line long, It being marked as a stub just means it's smaller than an average article, and it could be expanded. Duonaut  ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, i did not know that. By the way, I apologize for swearing - i lost my temper. Mediterraneanism check (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's completely fine, I forgive you. :) Duonaut  ^{(talk | contribs)} 17:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit to Coupe de Ville you removed redlinks to names of four coachbuilders. I have not replaced them because I have no idea whether these coachbuilders are notable or not, but I would suggest that you look through WP:REDDEAL. It is a guideline as to how to deal with redlinks, which are not necessarily bad to have in articles, as they encourage editors with enough sources of information on the subject to create the article. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 23:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SamBlob: Sorry for not replying earlier, I was busy, I might revert my edit if I can find some dirt regarding notability of the subjects. Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SamBlob: The coachbuilders seem to be somewhat notable, and I believe there is already an article on rothschild at Clément-Rothschild. Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad for reverting you, you're right there is already an article. Cheers!--A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me. Moves.} 21:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AbigailAbernathy:It's fine, You might have gotten confused since i didn't complete the link at first. Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 21:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 21:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gabrielm199: I'm not exactly new cause i've been here for four months and before that i started editing under My IP in about june i think, But should i take it anyways or...? :P Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 00:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gabrielm199: Actually, I was going to look at it after randomly looking at Fimatic's talk page archive, But I never used help desks under my IP or on this account except for answering something at the Teahouse which doesn't really count so :P Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for considering it! Gabrielm199 (talk) 04:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ford LTD (Americas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sedan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duonaut. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 21:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain this revert? As I explained in my edit, the photo shows the wrong species. It shows Kryptopterus vitreolus, not Kryptopterus bicirrhis. Please also see the article text and associated citations, as they explain the differences between the two species in detail and why they historically frequently were confused (especially Ng and Kottelat 2013 [full citation in articles' ref. list] is useful and provides full details). The real Kryptopterus bicirrhis is completely different and looks like this. Regards, 62.107.209.103 (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh shoot!, I thought that the comment thingy had ended and you put the text by the picture link, Honest mistake. Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, mistake happen. Thanks for correcting and happy editing, 62.107.209.103 (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duonaut, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Laff alert topicon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duonaut. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Medieval England, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Medieval England and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medieval England during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dysklyver 21:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duonaut. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duonaut. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duonaut. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmastra Part one: Shiva.Movie is releasing this month within 4 days and after release we will get to know more things about Astraverse.This is not premature stage to create this page.If this gets deleted soon some will create again in this name after movie release. GameeMann (talk) 08:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. But I believe it is still protocol to let the speedy delete template stand until it is sorted out. However, you might ask one of this wiki's admins to be sure. In case it is deleted, you can go to WP:REFUND. The admins should see you disputing the notice at the Talk Page otherwise.
Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 08:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Duonaut. You recently edited the Feldenkrais Method Article. Hopefully you will engage about the need to improve the Feldenkrais Method Article and establish a Neutral Point of View consistent with Wikipedia policy.

I will in the coming weeks be inviting editors to my Sandbox and related talk page for consideration and discussion of needed changes. User:Bbachrac/sandbox Since you are a very experienced editor, I hope you will contribute to either making the article NPOV or having it removed.

In the mean time, please review this National Institute of Health article Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name?

I would also value your opinion on Wikipedia Articles appropriating and redefining Service Marked terms and applying defamatory and pejorative terminology while ignoring reliable sources but claiming there are none. As early as 2015 there were peer reviewed review articles concerning the effectiveness of the teaching practice. Meanwhile Dr. David Gorski blog opinion comments are given prominence.

The Feldenkrais Method^SM is complementary to Physical Therapy and many licensed Physical Therapist are Guild trained and incorporate the method into their proactive. That would seem to establish that using the term "Fringe" is not Appropriate.

Thank you for your consideration Bbachrac (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbachrac: Admittedly this is not my area of expertise (I edited according to consensus) but I can read journals and such so I'll see if I can do anything. I'd advise posting this on the talk page of Feldenkrais Method, as well, if you haven't already. Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 00:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shura Council (Yemen), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Yemen currently has two parliamentary upper houses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shura Council (Yemen). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shura Council (Yemen)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2000 Taiwanese presidential election you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2000 Taiwanese presidential election you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2000 Taiwanese presidential election for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 23:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2000 Taiwanese presidential election you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2000 Taiwanese presidential election for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2000 Taiwanese presidential election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2000 Taiwanese presidential election ended more than 50 years of Kuomintang rule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2000 Taiwanese presidential election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2000 Taiwanese presidential election), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, feel free to put your articles up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for letting me know about this. Duonaut ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duonaut! You might be interested in endorsing an essay in which creation I participated – WP:NOCONFED. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you’re a member of the WikiProject China - I’ve made some proposals to update the article about Pinduoduo, posted here Pinduoduo#Suggestions for article improvements to resolve NPOV and Advertising issues.I have a conflict of interest and can’t do the edits myself. Would you have time to look at these and weigh in? Gratitude. Snowy2000 (talk) 20:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1874 Alabama gubernatorial election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1874 Alabama gubernatorial election was marred by violence and fraud? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1874 Alabama gubernatorial election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1874 Alabama gubernatorial election), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Medieval England has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]