Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii § Campaign to upload Lāhainā photographs.

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296 Online events: New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023 Announcement In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part of the #1day1woman initiative! Tip of the month: Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

sir to leave someone --RUDRA2121 (talk) 07:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit to Nabila Espanioly you added sfn references to "Neslen 2011". Unfortunately no such source is listed in the article, so nobody can look it up, and the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply yhe missing source that would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 00:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DuncanHill! Thank you for flagging this for me. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 05:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Crossing a Line (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Makeandtoss (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304 Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman. Tip of the month: If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Dear Ezlev, glad to have you as my mentor.

I've just started today with Wikipedia. I started practising with some draft content on Sandbox as I had some doubts.

1. On the sandbox page, how can I save the text? 2. How can I submit the sandbox text to someone to verify it before publishing? 3. where should I store the pictures that I will add to the article?

Meanwhile, I will take some time to study all the editing rules.

I look forward to hearing from you. Maria --Maria João Alexandre (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maria! Glad you're here. When editing any page, the "Publish changes" button will save your changes. It's usually blue and in the top right corner of your screen. Articles for creation is the process for having someone more experienced look at your article before it is published to the main encyclopedia. You can get started on an article using the Article wizard. As for photos, the information at Wikipedia:Images might help? Please feel free to let me know if you have any more questions! — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 21:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in draft. Please guide me how to publish it from draft? --TalentedRanish (talk) 18:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TalentedRanish, I assume you're referring to Draft:BharatKul.com? This can't be published as an article. Wikipedia articles must have a neutral point of view and be based on reliable sources. I'll leave a note on your talk page with some more information about how Wikipedia works. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 20:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
11,067		Gaza Strip (talk)	Add sources
1,270		Maui (talk)	Add sources
4		Meindert Talma & the Negroes (talk)	Add sources
484		Thrust (talk)	Add sources
48		Academic audit (talk)	Add sources
28		Johan (band) (talk)	Add sources
88		Balthazar (band) (talk)	Cleanup
93		Oscar and the Wolf (talk)	Cleanup
10		The Political Quarterly (talk)	Cleanup
99		Israeli torture in the occupied territories (talk)	Expand
13		Episcopal Diocese of Hawaii (talk)	Expand
526		+972 Magazine (talk)	Expand
18		Typhoon (rapper) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
13		LGBT+ media (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
184		American Enlightenment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
154		Zeds Dead (talk)	Merge
539		Non-monogamy (talk)	Merge
258		Antisemitism in the United States (talk)	Merge
114		Jon Fratelli (talk)	Wikify
43		Hakeem Belo-Osagie (talk)	Wikify
33		Goose (Belgian band) (talk)	Wikify
21		Voter turnout in the European Parliament elections (talk)	Orphan
2		Lisa Bulawsky (talk)	Orphan
10		Owase Jeelani (talk)	Orphan
12		Isabel Fillardis (talk)	Stub
6		Temple Emanu-El (Honolulu) (talk)	Stub
6		Elmer Cravalho (talk)	Stub
29		Abigail Kapiolani Kawānanakoa (talk)	Stub
12		Hawaii Tribune-Herald (talk)	Stub
7		Hannibal Tavares (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brothers of Italy on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass 00:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

What are all the syntax that I can use such as being able to hyperlink important articles or phrases?

Thanks --MEMZite (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MEMZite, you may want to take a look at Help:Wikitext for syntax info! Let me know if you have any other questions. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 22:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TYSM! MEMZite (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit here, and at least regarding the book it seems to be an appropriate action, as it probably meets notability despite the rather mixed quality of it’s coverage, so no objection to the action taken there, thank you for fixing my error.

That being said, I don’t believe that the requirement In general, a red link should remain in an article if there is a reasonable expectation that the article in question will eventually be created (either as its own article or as a redirect); remove red links if and only if Wikipedia should not have any coverage on the subject. (WP:REDLINK) is met for the two organisations due to lack of coverage that allows for inclusion.

If you disagree with my assessment, I would greatly appreciate a quick response?

Thank you :) FortunateSons (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FortunateSons,

• Adalah Justice Project: [1], [2]; also covered in Greater Than The Sum of Our Parts by Nada Elia, which I'm reading this weekend. It's possible this should end up redirecting to a subsection of Adalah (legal center).
• Against Canary Mission: [3], [4], [5], for starters

These are from a couple minutes of searching. I think it's safe to say that there is a reasonable expectation that the article in question will eventually be created. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Regarding Adalah, I agree with your assessment (but can’t currently access JSTOR, so I’m going to have to trust you on content).

I am a lot less sure certain about ACM, where the coverage (at least the ones I could find) was only in passing and of lower quality, but I don’t object to it staying for a while and seeing if it turns into something.

All other coverage I could find is probably insignificant or unusable for other reasons: [1][2][3][4][5][6].

Have I missed something? FortunateSons (talk) 23:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FortunateSons, I'm not sure that you have missed anything. Maybe ACM could be incorporated into Canary Mission. I went ahead and removed that redlink. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 17:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you very much :) FortunateSons (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM – Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2024 Headlines Albania report: WikiGap Tirana 2024 Australia report: Art+Feminism in Australia Belgium report: Belgian Public domain day and Wiki Loves Heritage awards on March 7 Brazil report: A GLAM focus on Rio de Janeiro; Archivos en vigília Colombia report: Making the public domain visible on Wikidata; In Colombia Women are historical Italy report: GLAM call winner projects Netherlands report: GLAMorousToHTML - a tool to list Wikipedia articles that include images from a given Commons category New Zealand report: Update on Wikidata:WikiProject Te Papa research expeditions and the Wikipedian at Large Poland report: What's up in GLAM-Wiki in Poland in March Sweden report: More photo memories – and the community is helping out; Yearly student project Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Programme UK report: A small problem with the Ottoman Empire USA report: GLAM CSI and WikiPortraits launch and more meetups Biodiversity Heritage Library report: BHL-Wiki Working Group March monthly highlights Content Partnerships Hub report: GLAMorousToHTML - a tool to list Wikipedia articles that include images from a given Commons category Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: WikiLearn course for OpenRefine on Wikimedia Commons WMF GLAM report: Learn to upload to Commons with OpenRefine and get up to date on the International Museum Day, GLAM CSI, WiLMa Network, and WikiWorkshop Calendar: April's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
• Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
• Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ezlev, would you be able to expand upon and clarify "allegations against Marsan" in the Controversies section of the Brandy Melville article. For context and BLP reasons. Thanks Samuel Wiki (talk) 04:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Wiki, clarified a bit, thanks! Feel free to make any other changes you think are necessary, of course. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 16:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! How does editing...work? (It's stupid, I know) --Izabelleangel (talk) 22:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not stupid at all, Izabelleangel! We all start somewhere. Help:Editing is a good overall resource, if a bit complicated. The Wikipedia Adventure is a simpler and fun way to learn how editing works! I'll also leave some useful resources on your talk page, and feel free to ask questions here anytime. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 22:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks!! Izabelleangel (talk) 22:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was going to post this at Talk:Queers Read This but I had two personal notes that I can't give up ;)

While published anonymously, the identity of at least some of the writers is known. In ACT UP's correspondence, David Robinson claims he "wrote about half of 'I Hate Straights'" (i.e., Queers Read This). See Gale HDJXWX953408614, which is cited approvingly elsewhere. Robinson mentions that it's published under his name in the Windy City Times at some point, but I can't track down that issue now. It appears this is corroborated in David Feinberg's Queer and Loathing. Sarah Schulman gives the authors as "David Robinson, Maxine Wolfe, Heidi Dorow, Vincent Gagliostro, Tracy Morgan" in Let the Record Show. Schulman interviewed Finkelstein in 2010 here (hopefully good link?) where he confirms his involvement.

I imagine one can discuss the other projects authored by 'Anonymous Queers' in relation to IHS / QRT. Finkelstein's book After Silence lists some of these projects out at plate 10: Don't Tread on Me, etc. Besides this, it would be good to detail the contemporary reception of IHS / QRT. Outweek has a good long piece on it here, p. 40-45. There are other contemporary reviews / debates / arguments over it throughout the gay press. Insofar as it matters, I think the article can't meet WP:GACR#3 - broadness - if contemporary reception and authorship are elided.

Two other notes. One on the lighter side: You might find the image of Buttigieg at the bottom of this blog humorous. The other: You'd like Homosexuals Intransigent (redlink!), a very interesting and militant paper c. 1970. I might review the article properly but busy, busy, so just thought I'd stop by with a few comments. Best of luck, Urve (talk) 10:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Urve! These are important sources, and more than that, they look like fascinating reads. I'm grateful that you take the time to share your knowledge and wisdom with the world here on Wikipedia, and I'm eager to expand the article as soon as meatspace obligations allow.
(And yes, I did giggle at Buttigieg. Thanks for that.) — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 16:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For another giggle, see p. 46 of the Outweek issue linked above. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 16:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]