Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

Thank you to everyone who recommended I try out the New Page Reviewer right, however, I have opted not to make it permanent nor do I intend on returning to it for as long as this message is up. New page reviewing doesn't seem to make sense to me given all I've ever used it for (mostly) was page reviewing redirects following bad article attempts. Even that part of Wikipedia has given me a small amount of stress, and I've had to back away from disputes to avoid making that stress worse.

In short, it doesn't make sense to me to keep a user right if I know I'm not going to use it as frequently, especially given I might leave Wikipedia within the next few years. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was coming here to leave a message to you regarding NPP, and saw this. Too bad, we could use quality folks over there, but I definitely understand about the stress. Thanks for all you do. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Coquille (engineering) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Coquille (engineering) until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the interracial marriage article because the text I struck out was not an example of interracial marriage.

Mongols and Chinese are both the same Asiatic Mongoloid raice, that's interethnic marriage. Someone mistakenly wrote that the law made Hui intermarry with Han when that's not true.

I added a reliable source (Kenneth M. Swope book) saying that Kipchaks and Hui were excluded from the marriage law, with the Ming code explicitly saying that's because of their different racial features like blonde hair.

The Ming law is actually not promoting interracial marriage but only inter-ethnic marriage within one race.

If you're not happy about striking out, I can fix the text without hiding it.Dasfanda (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diff - Happy to make updates if you can specify what's out of date. Rcsprinter123 (cackle) 18:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only the South Route. Everything else is fine. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Made an updated version with South now extending to Liverpool, which I think is the only change? Rcsprinter123 (banter) 17:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Leijurv (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JalenFolf,

Because of this RFC completed in March all TV series page titles that list a season have had the parentheses removed. I don't agree with this decision, I think it looks awful but on March 30th, a bot changed TV series season page titles to remove all of the existing parentheses. The exception seems to have been if the page title was for a redirect, not an article, then it wasn't corrected. But if an editor wants you to move a TV series season back to the old style, then know that at some point, it will be moved back to accommodate the new consensus on how TV series season page titles should appear. Just letting you know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!}