Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}}

— The Anome (talk) 11:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

worldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

please change user name, sorry for offending, must have auto filled on account creation fro another fourm PurpleHeadedStinkHammer (talk) 07:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have renamed your account and will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks !!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Northern Ireland Protocol into Ben Habib. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, sorry I did not know this rule, I copied to add clarity to the article I was editing, I will add in the edit summary WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:minor edit. You tagged all of your edits to Edwin Poots as minor, but none were. "Minor" means a trivial change to spelling, word order or grammar that has no appreciable effect on meaning. Size does not matter: a one-letter change from "now" to "not" (or vice versa) would definitely not qualify as "minor". 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that nobody welcomed you, so it is hardly surprising that you have tripped over some very common mistakes. No harm done. So...

Hello, WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi there ! sorry, i thought "Major" would be a whole new section, therefore 'Minor' would be adding a new paragraph to an existing section .... i will not tag future contributions as minor unless they are very small tweaks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are only about the millionth new editor to have made that mistake. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok. Hope you're right that they don't disappear. BorgQueen (talk) 09:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing one by one manually, please ensure the links are not modified automatically again, can you add the page to an exception list ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 09:24, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just added this template. The poor bot will never bother the page again. BorgQueen (talk) 09:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

perfect, thanks ! could you please add same to "John Martin Scripps" page, as I have the same sort of links on that ? ill tidy them up next WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 09:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh hang on, u add this to top of page?;

"bots|deny=InternetArchiveBot"

is it OK if i add to pages with similar links ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 09:50, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should be ok. BorgQueen (talk) 10:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker! Your additions to Johannes van Damme have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:08, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, sorry but the text you are refering to is public knowledge and not copyrighted , quoted from Singapore government itself, i only added a link to the news story to give people more reference points ... appologies anyway, i will add in a link to another source next week when i have time, perhapse the Singapore gov website itself, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, seeing as that entire section has now been removed, could i kindly request that you please remove any "strikes" against my account ? I will endeavor not to offend any rules regarding copyright in the future, i always paraphrase anything i want to add in my own words from newspapaer articles anyway, i would never cut & paste a section unless it is a publicly available quote & there is not other way to communicate it effectively ... happy New Year !! WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 10:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker. Thank you for your work on Tong Ching Man. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: you are welcome, i hope to create as many articles as possible for similar cases, assuming i can collect enough relevant data with links to articles WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice your rather new here, but I have been severely critical of the purported biography of Mohamed Isnin Saleh that you recently contributed. I am not sure what you are trying to write about, but the contribution you have made is definitely not written like a biography. When writing about criminals, they are often only notable for the crimes they commit. In cases where a person is notable for only one event, the general rule is to cover the event, not the person. Had this article been titled as being about the 2003 drug raid in which Isnin and his compatriots were arrested, then it would have been reasonably good start, but as a biography, it just doesn't work for me. To understand what I am driving at, you might find it helpful to read what some other Wikipedans say about contributing content to Wikipedia, writing biographies, and notability. Last, but not least, I invite you to discuss my comments with the aim of improving the article in question. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there ! i wads trying to keep to the format of other Capital_punishment_in_Singapore#Drug_trafficking_cases, such as Johannes van Damme, where the bullet point entry is the offenders name but the content of the article is the circumstances of the crime and the ensuing trial / execution. I suppose we could change the title to "2001 Cascadale Condominium Heroin Seizure", but I am sure that would ring just as few bells with readers as "Mohamed Isnin Saleh" would. Also, looking at other articles such as Chijioke Stephen Obioha and Norasharee Gous there is very little written about their Background but alot about the crime / trial. I am not sure what I could do to improve this article to your satisfaction apart from changing the title, I only wrote it and several similar ones to help publicize various cases of people executed for narcotics by the Singaporean government, as information is very hard to find online for most of them. WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I pointed out initially, criminals, are often only notable for the crimes they commit. That means the general rule is to cover the event, not the person, because it is much easier to find information on-line about the events, compared to the person. If you look at the 3 biographic article you have cited as exemplars, you will notice that they all have numerous sources that provide background information about these people. If you are having a great deal of difficulty finding on-line sources about a person, then that is a good indication that the person is a low profile individual, and is probably not going to be notable enough to warrant their own Wikipedia entry. Please be aware that while Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not the place to help publicize the case of every person executed for drug trafficking. Also, an article about the "2001 Cascadale Condominium heroin seizure" is probably best first included as a small section in an, as yet unwritten, article about "Drug Trafficking in Singapore", or a related article. You need to have articles that refer to any article you might write in place first, because these are going to be places where you can mention the seizure and summarize its importance before attempting to write a more comprehensive article about the seizure, itself. If you read the essay about writing an article first, you will notice that the recommended practice is to create an article before linking it to another article, and avoid having red links in articles. However, the list of Drug trafficking cases in the article about Capital punishment in Singapore, doesn't follow that advice and is full of red links as a result. There is probably a very good reason that articles have not been written about these people, yet, which is likely because it is difficult to find enough sources to write about those individuals as they are not notable. So, this might not be the best article to use as a starting point for creating a new Wikipedia article. All the red links in the article are likely to be otherwise non-notable criminals who are only notable for being executed. An article about one of these people should probably be called Execution of .... or something similar, because you do not have enough information about their full life to write a full Biography; only enough to write about the circumstances of their execution. I suspect that this is the article you have really written about in the case of Mohamed Isnin Saleh and his associates - in reality it is about the executions of 3 people for a single joint crime. In some respects, the exercise of writing for Wikipedia is not about finding a red link in an existing article and writing about the topic suggested, rather it is about first finding, and then writing about, a new topic or subject that Wikipedia doesn't yet cover, for example "Drug trafficking in Singapore", or expanding an existing article that might be an overview subject, like Organised crime in Singapore, (which does not cover drug trafficking at the moment), or Crime in Singapore, (which only mentions penalties for drug trafficking), and then improving it. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, thank you for taking the time to write a comprehensive reply that clearly explains the rules ! digesting your advice, i dont think there is much I can do to improve the articles i have written, as there is close to zero info about the subjects the cover online and i had to dig deep into archived newspapers to find out about them. This yielded mostly court reports and not a huge amount about their back ground. Even where i did find background info, like with Angel Mou Pui Peng this has been rejected as not notable, which is fair enough as i dont make the rules ... however i will highlight that there are countless other articles about other people who could be deemed not notable, such as Charles Brooks Jr. , that have been on Wikipedia for many years without issue WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan McKenzie (murderer) is another example WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker: What is notable about both the Charles Brooks Jr. and Duncan McKenzie (murderer) articles are the number of citations about these individuals, 10 and 12, respectively, and that their executions are considered firsts after various US Supreme Court decisions. Because these people spend a great deal of time on Death Row in the United States, they have time to acquire a degree of notoriety in the news media, which make them notable by a consensus agreement among Wikipedians. This sort of languishing on Death Row doesn't appear to happen with Singaporeans who are executed, so they have no time to go through a similar process. What is notable is that Singapore does execute a lot of drug traffickers, so a list of their names is suitable for an article. But because the process is much swifter and far less publicized by the news media, there are far fewer independent sources to use to create a stand-alone article about an executed person, let alone a substantial one. In such situations, you are far better off writing about the crimes that these people feature in, rather than the individuals themselves. In the case of Mohamed Isnin Saleh and his associates, you could write, word for word, almost the same article about each of his associates, apart from changing the name in the title, and first sentence. In this sort of situation, it is the crime that has been committed that is much more notable that the individual people executed for it. Whether that crime merits its own article is a different question. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider contributing to the discussion about the deletion of the Mohamed Isnin Saleh article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 03:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you again for your advice ... how about i create a page "Drug Trafficking in Singapore" and add in each of the offending articles as paragraphs, would that work ? something like this:

==================================

opening paragraph

the brief history is blah blah

can be split into 2: local dealers and drug mules caught at airport

notable local drug busts

bust a

arrest of offender

trail

verdict and sentence

notable drug mules

person a

arrest

trail

verdict and sentence

person b

arrest

trail

verdict and sentence

==================================

Separate question .... can you please confirm the following article is notable and doesnt offend any rules, before i create any more similar ones?: Tiong Bahru bus hijacking WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Wikipedia is not an INDISCRIMINATE collection of items in a list, nor is it a database of people or events. While Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and contains encyclopedic content, not everything gets included. A fair amount of content curation is undertaken, with any examples you provide needing to demonstrate both the subtleties and extremes of the topic in question. If you were to write an article about "Drug trafficking in Singapore" (note the capitalization), it should much more like the Drug trafficking by country section in the article about the Illegal drug trade, with a lot more analysis and research citations about the Singaporean aspects of the subject. Also, its content should not duplicate that in the article about Capital punishment in Singapore. Also, since Wikipedia does not have hard and fast rules, I cannot give any guarantee about the notability of, or applicability of any Wikipedia guidelines to, either the Tiong Bahru bus hijacking or any other Wikipedia article. This is a consensus decision that is made by all contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia has various processes available to you, or any editor, if you want to test that consensus. And you will only find this out by following the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK sure, i think ill just add the ref links to each row in the Capital punishment in Singapore so people can read up some more on each one if they wish, would that be acceptable ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You, and almost everyone else on the internet have the ability to edit almost every Wikipedia article. Rather than discussing here what you propose to do to the Capital punishment in Singapore article, please be bold and add in-line citations for each case that you think needs it. I cannot give you any indication if what you propose to do will be acceptable to Wikipedia editors. Simply be bold and do it, and then wait to see if your edits are accepted or rejected. Citations for reliable sources are usually acceptable, but if your edits are rejected, then discuss why on the Talk:Capital punishment in Singapore page, (not here), and reach an agreement with other editors about what you should do. You might want to use a citation template, and there is one for citing court cases. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ng Kwok Chun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ng Kwok Chun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker. Thank you for your work on Tiong Bahru bus hijacking. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the approval ! many of my other articles seem to be rejected for odd reasons, i will try to write more in the style of this one WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Ko Mun Cheung is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Ko Mun Cheung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wong Wai Hung is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wong Wai Hung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 00:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of major crimes in Singapore (before 2000). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NOTNEWS I don't see any significance in this having a standalone article. This is a routine coverage of Singapore's typical anti-drug enforcement. Nothing out of the norm: foriegners getting caught for carrying drugs and getting executed. There's no other challenges, i.e. stay of execution, etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angel Mou Pui Peng and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 05:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 05:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Isnin Saleh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Isnin Saleh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, yes i dont think this deserves its own article, please dont delete it, or the other i have created, for a few days please until i receive direction on how to remedy

I think i should create an over arching article "Drug Trafficking in Singapore" and add in each of the offending articles as paragraphs, would that work ? something like this:

==================================

opening paragraph

the brief history is blah blah

can be split into 2: local dealers and drug mules caught at airport

notable local drug busts

bust a

arrest of offender

trail

verdict and sentence

notable drug mules

person a

arrest

trail

verdict and sentence

person b

arrest

trail

verdict and sentence

================================== WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion does NOT take place on your talk page! You need to visit the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Isnin Saleh and discuss the deletion proposal there, not here. Keep your discussion short and simple, if possible - like the first line of your comment, here - avoid too much detail, unless asked. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elke Tsang Kai Mong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elke Tsang Kai Mong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker, I am NelsonLee20042020 I am writing you this message to show you encouragement and support, to tell you not be disheartened.

There are times where some articles would get nominated for deletion, which may result in deletion or keep or merge. I got myself a fair share of nominations too even though I havent got a deleted article on my record.

I believe you are writing what you think deserves their standalone articles, but there are things to take note when you make articles, probably like the notability of the event (like Toa Payoh ritual murders, Sunny Ang and Anthony Ler), the media coverage of the event (like Kallang River body parts murder), as well as the legal significance/effects a case may bring about (like the notorious gunman Lim Ban Lim whose case prompted the passing of the 1973 Arms Offences Act and the Oriental Hotel murder where one of the convicts' appeal led to changes to life imprisonment laws). Many other factors may also determine how notable the event is (I myself also cannot remember every guideline too to be honest).

Not just newspaper articles (of whichever language like english and chinese) as cited sources, you may consider adding maybe like links to any documentaries or books or relevant journals that cover the legal cases.

This is probably all the advice I wish to offer to you as best as I am concerned. Hope you will continue editing, and dont let the deletion nominations become the setback against you :)

Thank you and have a nice day ahead --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi NelsonLee, thank you for taking the time to leave a message ! yes i will make a few more like Tiong Bahru bus hijacking and hope it doesnt get deleted WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Have fun editing in Wikipedia --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 07:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

could you please have a look at an edit i have made to Johannes van Damme ? i know its only one ref but i have explained my reasoning in the talk page, would like some advice if you could, thanks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Johannes_van_Damme#%27Background_to_Arrest%27_section WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@NelsonLee20042020 30 years ago today international narcotics trafficker John Obiefuna walked out of Singapore High court a free man and left his drug mule Johannes van Damme to take the rap for +5 kg of heroin he was caught with at Changi Airport .... WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. LibStar (talk) 01:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, i will do this now WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker,

Just a note that while you can make multiple comments at an AFD discussion you can only "vote" once. Right now, you are voting twice and other editors are taking the time to strike out your duplicate vote. Please make sure when you are participating at an AFD that you only cast one vote. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh, sorry about that, i thought the new line allowed a fresh round of voting by everyone ... my mistake, thanks for the clarification ! WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Tails Wx 11:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh i am sorry, i did not know that was against policy .... i asked because that person had previously argued in favour of Keeping the exact same article so was giving a nudge as it was down to a final vote, thanks for clarifying i will not do this again WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 11:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry :) Please do keep this in mind, though! Tails Wx 13:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like you didn't understand the point that @Liz made above. We each get to vote only once when an article is at WP:AFD. When it is renominated, that is to give time and opportunity for editors who did not already vote to participate, not for those of us who !voted already to opine again. CT55555(talk) 23:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes i did not understand, thanks for explaining WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Wang Ziqi mugshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, I will delete this image from the associated page until the issue is clarified, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 14:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wang Ziqi mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

notted, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Execution of Angel Mou Pui Peng, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky thank you Sir for reconsidering this article for publication, much appreciated ! WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker. This is Nelson. I hereby congratulate you about the approved publication of Angel Mou Pui-peng. This is good news and I am glad for you too. Anyways, thank you for telling me this and happy editing! :) --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks @NelsonLee20042020, i feel her case was the lynch pin to alot of others who met the same fate due to the world wide coverage of her execution WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 10:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, pal. Thanks for the editing you made in Tangaraju Suppiah. I got exams in this week itself so I did not have time to go into the specific details of the case other than updating small info. You did a great deal of help here, and thanks again. Just wanna show my gratitude here :) --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@NelsonLee20042020 no problem, I read about this yesterday on a local news site and it got me interested in the case, i cant seem to find anything online regarding reporting in Singapore itself regarding the case at the time of the trail itself, must not have been judged to be newsworthy .... i have all the relevant edits completed now but will keep checking online for more sources incase anyone complains we only use the trial transcript (tho we can argue its the only true source available), i will also highlight continuing international reaction to bolster the article's worthiness for publication ... P.S. good luck with your exams !! WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 10:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

more complete judgement here btw .... https://www.elitigation.sg/gdviewer/gd/2018_SGHC_279/pdf WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. that means a lot --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toa Payoh ritual murders crime scene.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The heroin brand 'Double UO Globe' logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Poon Yuen Chung bag.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Martin Scripps hotel bill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 01:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop uploading unnecessary unfree media to articles. Unfree media is only used for essential identification when a free alternative is impossible (i.e. the subject is dead and no free images of them were made when they were alive) or in isolated cases where something is specifically discussed in depth and the image provides meaningful illustration of that specific subject (i.e. not blurry black and white photos of empty rooms or hotel bills) Dronebogus (talk) 07:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yeah ill try WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 09:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Delroy Grant crime scenes map.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please delete it WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Darin and Sheila Damude.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm told that I should notify an uploader of a file, so here I am. I have decided to propose deletion on File:Gerard Lowe.jpg, which you uploaded. If you have any objections, please, within seven days after (the date of) tag placement, do not hesitate to go to the filepage and then remove the tag. I can't reinsert the tag once removed, so I may take the file to WP:FFD if that happens. George Ho (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so i can simply remove the tag without giving any explanation ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you've done it, I've taken the image to the Files for Discussion venue (2023 June 21 page). --George Ho (talk) 08:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GR8 WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Martin Scripps forge Darin Damude signature.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for notice, I have renominated the file for discussion. --George Ho (talk) 21:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

up to you, i have said my piece, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1995 Okinawa rape incident Perpetrators.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Murder of Adrian Donohoe has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i did not intentionally add copyrighted material but tried to paraphrase from court reports 08:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC) WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shenyang J 15 fighter jet flying from Shandong April 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:1995 Okinawa rape incident Perpetrators.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 14:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Iruka13, i cannot find the original article from BBC News, but the same photo is on this page if that helps ?:http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/9512/japan_rape/12-27/ WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 15:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1995 Okinawa rape incident Perpetrators.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I tagged this file because US Government works are always in public domain, so we should find a higher-resolution version of these 3 portraits instead of claiming fair use, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cheuk Mei Mei.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to South Africa and weapons of mass destruction has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Diannaa, sincere apologies if i have copied the content over in violation of the rules, i always try to paraphrase information but this subject is quite complicated and the only way to accurately replicate it is to copy over some of it verbatim. This book is also the only source on the internet with the actual information also. Sorry !! WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 13:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hope you dont mind but I added an extra line (in my own words) to help explain the over arching reason for splitting the device into two pieces: "This enabled strict security procedures to be enforced, such as storing each subsection in separate vaults with different codes for each door, which were intended to help prevent anyone from having easy access to an entire weapon system." WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That version looks good. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Flor Contemplacion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mary Jane Fiesta Veloso.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK sure, apologies for uploading, it was not my intention to violate any rules, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 09:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Misuse of Drugs Act (Singapore) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Documentation: The Singapore Government agency website where the text was copied states the following: "© 2023 Attorney-General's Chambers of Singapore". The Copypatrol report on this case is located here. Regards,  Spintendo  02:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, i was simply documenting the punishments as out lined in the actual Misuse of Drugs Act (https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act-Rev/MDA1973/Published/20010731?DocDate=19981215&ProvIds=Sc2-#Sc2-), no idea if it is copy righted, as its the publicly distributed text of an actual law & there really is no other way of presenting the facts except quoting verbatim. However if it has broken copyright rules i do apologies as it is not my intention, as previous articles and edits submitted by me can attest to, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 14:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Martin Scripps forge Darin Damude signature.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]