Add links

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}. The {{?}} template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

 Grunners

A full check is needed, I believe. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • [1] may have been copied from [2], but it's too old to tell. I'm seeing a lot of suspicious content, but Google turns up nothing. MER-C 12:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • [3] was copied from [4]. Accepting. MER-C 12:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User has continued copyright violations eight years later, now indef-blocked and CCI will need expanding. Wizardman 01:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

Grunners (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

This report covers contributions to 884 articles from timestamp 2004-05-13 16:05:30 UTC to timestamp 2015-05-11 10:52:47 UTC.

Subpage (edits after 11 May 2015 to block): Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Grunners 02.

Articles 1 through 20

Articles 21 through 40

Articles 41 through 60

Articles 61 through 80

Articles 81 through 100

Articles 101 through 120

Articles 121 through 140

Articles 141 through 160

Articles 161 through 180

Articles 181 through 200

Articles 201 through 220

Articles 221 through 240

Articles 241 through 260

Articles 261 through 280

Articles 281 through 300

Articles 301 through 320

Articles 321 through 340

Articles 341 through 360

Articles 361 through 380

Articles 381 through 400

Articles 401 through 420

Articles 421 through 440

Articles 441 through 460

Articles 461 through 480

Articles 481 through 500

Articles 501 through 520

Articles 521 through 540

Articles 541 through 560

Articles 561 through 580

Articles 581 through 600

Articles 601 through 620

Extended content

Clear section - all likely simple, most already gone. eviolite (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 621 through 640

Extended content

Clear section. eviolite (talk) 06:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 641 through 660

Articles 661 through 680

Articles 681 through 700

Articles 701 through 720

Articles 721 through 740

Articles 741 through 760

Articles 761 through 780

Section complete
Section complete. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 781 through 800

Articles 801 through 820

Articles 821 through 840

Articles 841 through 860

Articles 861 through 880

Articles 881 through 884

clear

checked by SYSS Mouse (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This report generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2015-08-17T12:35:18+00:00 in 1.30 sec.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/Grunners