Add links
< May 31 June 2 >

June 1

File:Joshua waits.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joshua waits.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • A mistake was made in the uploading of this image. My reason for uploading it qualifies as fair, but it is indicated as licensed and free when the image is clicked on. This IS NOT TRUE. Please delete this image before any confusion is started. Starwarsmaniac42 (talk) 00:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IsaacKannah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IsaacKannah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Photo of a football player, claimed own work, but looks like a screenshot from a video. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IbrahimKeita.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IbrahimKeita.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Photo of a football player, claimed own work, but looks like a screenshot from a video. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ibrahim S. Keita.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ibrahim S. Keita.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Photo of a football player, claimed own work, but looks like a screenshot from a video. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Isoseist Map - April 15 1979.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Little Mermaid Statue Copenhagen Denmark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Little Mermaid Statue Copenhagen Denmark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Clash 21051980 12 800.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this truly a free image? The source page states "Concert photography: © Helge Øverås. Must not be used without permission." This contradicts with the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. For a picture to be allowed on Commons it it must be truly free and permission is not required. SpeakFree (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Truro-Flag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Truro-Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is the flag of Truro, Massachusetts. The image is tagged with {{PD-old-100}}, which claims that the author died over 100 years ago. However, no evidence is provided to support this claim, and there seems to be some evidence that it is not true. This image is exactly the same image as the one at Flags of the World, a page written in 2005 (the image here was probably taken from there). The description at FOTW says, "From http://www.truromass.org/stuac/ the flag was designed by a Truro Central School third grade student…," and this claim was also recently made by an anonymous editor on the file description page here [1]. I don't know when Truro Central School was founded; the school's Web page features a photo from 1939, but it isn't mentioned in History of Barnstable County, Massachusetts: Town of Truro, written in 1890. If Truro Central School was founded later than 1911, the {{PD-old-100}} tag is certainly false; even if it was founded between 1890 and 1911, the tag is likely false, because it is unlikely that a third-grade student attending the school during that time would have died before 1911. —Bkell (talk) 17:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Oak-Bluffs-Seal.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oak-Bluffs-Seal.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is the seal of Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts. The image is tagged with {{PD-old-100}}, which claims that the author died over 100 years ago. However, no evidence is provided to support this claim. The seal itself includes the date 1907, so it could not have been created before that date; in order for the {{PD-old-100}} tag to be true, the creator must have died no more than four years after creating the seal. —Bkell (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Oak-Bluffs-Flag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oak-Bluffs-Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is the flag of Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts. The image is tagged with {{PD-old-100}}, which claims that the author died over 100 years ago. However, no evidence is provided to support this claim. The flag features the town seal (see discussion above), which includes the date 1907, so it could not have been created before that date; in order for the {{PD-old-100}} tag to be true, the creator must have died no more than four years after creating the seal. Additionally there is a potential copyright in the photography of this flag. —Bkell (talk) 17:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Remaining flag and seal images uploaded by User:Henry the heron

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, by Skier Dude.-FASTILY (TALK) 06:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All of these flag and seal images were uploaded by User:Henry the heron and tagged with {{PD-old-100}}, which claims that the authors died over 100 years ago. However, no evidence is provided to support these claims. In light of similar dubious claims made by this uploader (see discussions for File:Truro-Flag.jpg, File:Oak-Bluffs-Seal.gif, and File:Oak-Bluffs-Flag.jpg above, and the uploader's previously deleted images), I don't think we can assume that these {{PD-old-100}} claims are accurate. —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sony Ericsson T700.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sony Ericsson T700.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_June_1