Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs
Contents
Neutralhomer (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:::::::[[:File:WINC-AM 2020.png]], the last and final logo as WINC, after 80 years with the callsign. |
:::::::[[:File:WINC-AM 2020.png]], the last and final logo as WINC, after 80 years with the callsign. |
||
:::::::The "commentary" is at the bottom of each image. I can dig up the Internet Archive links for you, but that sounds like BURDEN. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;">Talk</span>]] • 01:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:::::::The "commentary" is at the bottom of each image. I can dig up the Internet Archive links for you, but that sounds like BURDEN. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;">Talk</span>]] • 01:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
*Just a reminder that the files are nominated at FFD. I won't be discussing them any further on your talk page because this is the wrong venue for it. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 01:50, 17 October 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:50, 17 October 2021
|
My Restrictions (please make a note of them)
- Indefinite ban on describing any edit as "vandalism"
- Indefinite WP:0RR restriction
- Indefinite anti-bludgeoning restriction; no more than one edit to a discussion page in a 24-hour period
- Indefinite accusation restriction; not allowed to accuse any editor of racism or prejudice
- Indefinite restriction on emailing other users
File:WDSW-LP CoverageArea.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WDSW-LP CoverageArea.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
From the edit summary in your second revert, it seems to me that you are being defensive about someone editing your writing, rather than thinking of the reader's experience. I'm sorry to have unintentionally insulted your writing with my edit summary, but my version is clearly more concise, and more accurate - for one thing, the statement "The Classic Country format will continue as an online-only station." is blatantly untrue considering that the very next sentence states that the format flipped back shortly after. Please don't reintroduce the inaccuracy again by reverting me a third time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos: I get "defensive" when someone "introduces" horrible grammar and lack of punctuation to a page and calls it "more concise"....and then proceeds to edit war about it. Now, I'll give you the format flip part. I didn't catch that. It happens. We call those "mistakes". I guess they don't have those in chaos. Don't apologize and then throw a veiled insult at me within the same sentence.
- Just for the record, the edit summary wasn't even close to "defensive", that was an explanation and a request. Even this isn't defensive. Snarky maybe, but not defensive. You don't want to see defensive. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Neutralhomer. Thank you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Files listed for discussion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 17 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Is there a problem with the files themselves, the FURs? How about we discuss it instead of you FfD'ing them? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have stated the reason why in the nominating statement. The discussion should take place at FFD where other editors can also provide their opionon. -- Whpq (talk) 01:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Yeah, I can read too...and I already have responded. You are supposed to talk to the user on their talk page first. You didn't even bother. Did you bother to check that the FURs had been changed prior to FfD'ing them? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is no requirement that I discuss this with you before nominating. I did see you changed the NFUR before nominating but changing the rationale information doesn't resolve the issue. -- Whpq (talk) 01:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, there is. It's on most pages and admins typically require it, plus it's a common courtesy. So, what would resolve the issue? Instead of waiting for someone to come along in the discussion and tell me? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- WP:NFCC#8 and contextual significance. The logos should be the subject of significant sourced commentary from reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq:: File:WINC-AM 2015.PNG, was the station's last logo prior to adding the 104.9 simulcast.
- File:WINC-AM WZFC-FM 2018.png, the station only held this logo while simulcasting with 104.9.
- File:WINC-AM 2020.png, the last and final logo as WINC, after 80 years with the callsign.
- The "commentary" is at the bottom of each image. I can dig up the Internet Archive links for you, but that sounds like BURDEN. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- WP:NFCC#8 and contextual significance. The logos should be the subject of significant sourced commentary from reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, there is. It's on most pages and admins typically require it, plus it's a common courtesy. So, what would resolve the issue? Instead of waiting for someone to come along in the discussion and tell me? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is no requirement that I discuss this with you before nominating. I did see you changed the NFUR before nominating but changing the rationale information doesn't resolve the issue. -- Whpq (talk) 01:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Yeah, I can read too...and I already have responded. You are supposed to talk to the user on their talk page first. You didn't even bother. Did you bother to check that the FURs had been changed prior to FfD'ing them? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have stated the reason why in the nominating statement. The discussion should take place at FFD where other editors can also provide their opionon. -- Whpq (talk) 01:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)