Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

View logs for this page (view filter log)

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

3 June 2024

1 June 2024

17 May 2024

16 April 2024

15 April 2024

14 April 2024

20 March 2024

10 March 2024

6 March 2024

2 March 2024

8 February 2024

30 January 2024

28 January 2024

26 January 2024

23 January 2024

14 January 2024

8 January 2024

4 January 2024

25 December 2023

24 November 2023

22 November 2023

  • curprev 17:5117:51, 22 November 202338.145.197.137 talk 106,423 bytes −290 The original text is misleading.in fact,after paperfully recognizes its existence. Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile app edit

20 November 2023

15 November 2023

11 November 2023

8 November 2023

3 November 2023

2 November 2023

27 October 2023

23 October 2023

  • curprev 13:5513:55, 23 October 202366.97.27.122 talk 105,214 bytes −18 altered the explanation of gravitational waves and the comparison to electromagnetic waves for clarity.

17 October 2023

  • curprev 03:1803:18, 17 October 2023Citation bot talk contribs 105,232 bytes +232 Alter: title, template type. Add: chapter-url, chapter, bibcode, arxiv, date, title, doi-access, authors 1-1. editors 1-2. Removed or converted URL. Removed access-date with no URL. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 60/245

14 October 2023

12 October 2023

26 September 2023

20 September 2023

8 September 2023

31 August 2023

18 August 2023

15 August 2023

14 August 2023

11 August 2023

5 August 2023

  • curprev 00:2600:26, 5 August 2023Drbogdan talk contribs 103,768 bytes +596 →‎History: add => <ref name="SA-20230804">{{cite news |last=O'Callaghan |first=Jonathan |title=A Background ‘Hum’ Pervades the Universe. Scientists Are Racing to Find Its Source - Astronomers are now seeking to pinpoint the origins of an exciting new form of gravitational waves that was announced earlier this year |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-background-hum-pervades-the-universe-scientists-are-racing-to-find-its-source/ |date=4 August 2023 |work=Scientific American... undo

1 August 2023

  • curprev 22:5122:51, 1 August 2023Catslash talk contribs 103,172 bytes −14 Undid revision 1164548361: pretty sure it was right before; certainly for EM rad, the amplitude goes like 1/r and the available power like the square of the amplitude - and see [http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/gwave_details.html] undo Tag: Undo

27 July 2023

23 July 2023

16 July 2023

12 July 2023

11 July 2023

10 July 2023

9 July 2023

6 July 2023

5 July 2023

2 July 2023

1 July 2023

30 June 2023

20 June 2023

15 June 2023

14 June 2023

13 June 2023

10 June 2023

15 May 2023

28 April 2023

24 April 2023

21 April 2023

20 April 2023

18 April 2023

11 April 2023

10 April 2023

29 March 2023

24 March 2023

19 March 2023

17 March 2023

9 March 2023

4 March 2023

13 February 2023

30 January 2023

25 January 2023

4 January 2023

1 January 2023

24 December 2022

23 December 2022

17 December 2022

16 December 2022

6 November 2022

15 October 2022

14 October 2022

  • curprev 10:0110:01, 14 October 2022LeeMcLoughlinScientist talk contribs 96,819 bytes +14 Made more clear that detected gravitational waves so far originate only from binary systems (accelerated masses). Further edits are required to explain that predicted gravitational waves from non accelerated masses remain hypothetical. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 October 2022

5 October 2022

  • curprev 13:4713:47, 5 October 2022VexRockwood talk contribs 96,619 bytes 0 →‎top: Most treatments consider relativity to still be a classical theory so it was Newton's model that was changed, not classical physics. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

14 September 2022

30 August 2022

25 August 2022

30 June 2022

9 June 2022

31 May 2022

  • curprev 10:1010:10, 31 May 2022Hnapel talk contribs 96,595 bytes +30 →‎History: the original verbiage didn't sound right as we should compare the forces of gravity and electrostatics, 'electricity' is a little to broad for this comparison

27 May 2022

25 May 2022

24 May 2022

23 May 2022

13 May 2022

7 May 2022

30 April 2022

23 April 2022

22 April 2022

19 April 2022

17 April 2022

7 April 2022

21 March 2022

18 March 2022

17 March 2022

14 March 2022

11 March 2022

6 March 2022

23 February 2022

12 February 2022

7 February 2022

30 January 2022

28 January 2022

  • curprev 20:5420:54, 28 January 2022Graeme Bartlett talk contribs 95,144 bytes +165 Undid revision 1068399466 by TerranIV (talk) 45° is correct and 90° is wrong, so should not use that wrong reference then Tag: Undo
  • curprev 06:2906:29, 28 January 2022TerranIV talk contribs 94,979 bytes −165 45 degree polarization of gravity waves is not supported by references. Yacine Ali-Ha¨ımoud of NYU indicates polarization is 90 degrees here: https://cosmo.nyu.edu/yacine/teaching/GR_2019/lectures/lecture23.pdf Second reference to effect on particles is left as it references the animation. Tag: Reverted

24 January 2022

17 January 2022

  • curprev 22:3222:32, 17 January 2022DVdm talk contribs 95,143 bytes −12,884 Undid revision 1066328736 by 2003:E3:1F2C:1977:F811:2AC1:7396:27B9 (talk) Largely unsourced, and Wikipedia is not a textbook. Take it to the talk page. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 21:3321:33, 17 January 20222003:e3:1f2c:1977:f811:2ac1:7396:27b9 talk 108,027 bytes +12,884 Undid revision 802296374 by TimothyRias (talk).The math part is actually quite informative and shouldn't be removed. Tag: Reverted

11 January 2022

4 January 2022

18 December 2021

14 December 2021

10 December 2021

6 December 2021

21 November 2021

13 November 2021

4 November 2021

27 October 2021

21 October 2021

20 October 2021

14 October 2021

14 August 2021

21 July 2021

9 July 2021

5 July 2021

29 June 2021

  • curprev 14:2714:27, 29 June 2021Drbogdan talk contribs 93,580 bytes +830 relevant ref adds => https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/29/science/black-holes.html - and - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e

21 June 2021

23 May 2021

6 May 2021

2 May 2021

30 April 2021

25 April 2021

13 April 2021

30 March 2021

29 March 2021

24 March 2021

19 March 2021

13 March 2021

7 March 2021

27 February 2021

18 February 2021

15 February 2021

21 January 2021

13 January 2021

22 December 2020

17 December 2020

  • curprev 20:2220:22, 17 December 20202604:2d80:d40d:f200:815b:4950:3fb:b5e5 talk 91,406 bytes −26 Deleted several synonym repititions. This sentence still needs editing, it's not clear what it is saying. Tag: Reverted

15 December 2020

14 December 2020

  • curprev 05:3005:30, 14 December 2020121.179.131.132 talk 91,432 bytes +793 Substitution of Non-Academic Source with Academic Literature with some High quality data supplement Tag: Reverted

29 November 2020

25 November 2020

24 November 2020

  • curprev 08:5808:58, 24 November 202037.161.232.9 talk 90,568 bytes +37 the detection was announced in joint press conferences by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations on 11 Feb 2016. The analysis of the signal was a joint effort of the two collaborations. Tag: Visual edit

18 November 2020

16 November 2020

4 November 2020

1 November 2020

29 October 2020

23 October 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)