Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Oncenawhile in topic Hoshea?

comment

why is this "Neo-Assyrian"? - Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 07:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Layard

I know Austen Layard is not the final word on this, but this article needs some citations from modern scholarship on some of the issues presented.Sweetmoose6 (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Significant

"is historically significant because it displays the earliest ancient depiction of an Israelite". Really? Is this the only reason for the most complete Assyrian obelisk to be historically significant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.62.57 (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Humri = Amorite?

This source suggests some scholars disagree with the translation as Omri in favour of Amorites.

Reflections on Biblical Histories: A Revised Chronology, Robert N. Palmer, p173

Oncenawhile (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hoshea?

Someone has changed all the references to Jehu to Hoshea, in this article and in one of the pictures. Can anyone explain? Oncenawhile (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply