Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

January 3

Template:Manglerud Star Ishockey roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused, out-of-date rosters Frietjes (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scale height

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undocumented template made as a test/demonstration and used in one discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, interesting, but doesn't appear to be that useful as a standalone template. we use some similar logic to scale the images in Module:Multiple image, so if needed, we could possibly split that module into submodules. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

XFL (2001) roster navboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These teams no longer exist, so they have no active rosters, hence there is no need to keep a record of their non-existent rosters. – PeeJay 02:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).