Informatics Educational Institutions & Programs

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Mills Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Book One Introduces us to: THE EDUCATION OF THE ARCHITECT, THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF ARCHITECTURE and THE DEPARTMENTS OF ARCHITECTURE (Morgan translation). The Wikipedia article omits this important material, citing only Town Planning. Many readers come to this work only to read these chapters, and there are many consequences to architectural theory because of such readings.

The article tells us that the word "commodity" is often misunderstood, but fails to tells how it should be understood. What would a better word be? —MiguelMunoz (talk) 19:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is Sir Henry Wotten's British term of translation of UTILITAS. Morris Hickey Morgan's 1914 translation uses "convenience". Today we would say usefulness, referring to our interaction with the work of architecture other than the aesthetic.

For those familiar with this work and its detail, it would be useful to have some input regarding the multiple meanings of Aqueduct, particularly correct classification: Aqueduct#Suggested split. —Sladen (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article mentions that concrete wasn't known at the authors time. However, in the last part of the original work about wells a recipe and use case for lining wells with cement is provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2121:308:343A:0:13:6D3D:F201 (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]